Rant

The article is arguing about the pipelines and how the construction of the pipeline was to be built under an american company. The article brings up a pipeline proposed from the past, almost 23 years ago. It is biased against the construction of the pipeline to say that the pipeline must be nationalist. The article affects people who are nationalists and people who control the oils in Canada. The Pipeline cannot be funded without the American companies so instead the prime minister says to give up patriotism.

The article is trying to convince the reader to stand up for patriotism. They give reasons and make the American companies seem bad. They use the placement of image to make the pipeline seem like a dirty thing to build and bad, as it does not look good with the environment as shown in the picture. The article attacks Canadian as to say, you think that the Americans can give advice to use more than we can give ourselves? The American company seems to have influenced the liberals. The article biases the decisions of Liberals by saying that they made the decisions because of wartimes and how extra connections to the Americans would be a good support. This is done to show that their reasonings for building the pipeline under American companies are outdated.

The article will affect the American people that are trying to buy the oils. It will also affect alberta’s and canada’s economy. The issue affects the economy of Canada and alberta, as a huge portion of Alberta’s economy comes the crude. The permission affects the residents of Alberta as well. People their will be affected by a dirty railroad built through their home. Another aspect are the who has past generations and ties from Canada for many years. Many respect their sovereignty and do not want to use American companies.